Cursor's Hooks feature reported as unreliable by users

Users on the Cursor subreddit are reporting that the app's Hooks feature behaves unpredictably. Hooks are meant to automatically run commands when certain events happen, like saving a file, but they're firing at wrong times or not at all.

Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that recently introduced a feature called Hooks — a way to automatically trigger commands when specific events occur, such as saving a file or finishing an AI edit.

However, users in the r/cursor community are flagging that Hooks are unreliable in practice. Reports include Hooks not firing when expected, or triggering at unintended moments. For solo developers or makers who rely on Cursor for automated workflows, this instability means you can't fully trust Hooks to run critical steps without manually double-checking.

Key points

  • Cursor's Hooks feature is being reported as unstable by real users
  • Hooks are designed to auto-run commands on events like file saves
  • Problems include Hooks not triggering on time or firing unexpectedly
  • Automated workflows that depend on Hooks may silently fail right now
  • Worth monitoring for an official fix before relying on Hooks in production

Quick term guide

subreddit
A topic-specific community inside Reddit where people post and discuss related content.
code editor
A special program used for writing and editing software instructions.
Solo developer
An individual who handles all parts of creating a project or product alone.
developers
Developers are people who build software, apps, or websites.
automated workflow
A series of tasks set up to run on their own without manual steps each time
workflows
The specific order of steps taken to finish a piece of work.
monitoring
Watching a system to see if it is working well or having problems.
production
The live version of a service that real users use.
Read original